Big Decisions: Signing Ales Hemsky

Jonathan Willis
February 18 2013 03:57PM

There are those who believe that the Edmonton Oilers made a mistake when they re-signed pending unrestricted free agent Ales Hemsky to a two-year/$10 million contract extension just under one year ago.

Those people are wrong. The Oilers made the right decision.

What Have You Done For Me Lately?

One of the more difficult parts of assessing a player is recognizing when a short-term trend is likely to continue or stop. At the time the Oilers re-signed Hemsky, he had played 47 games, scored just five times, and recorded 21 assists. He also had a minus-14 rating. The five goals quickly became a punch line, as pundits joked that the Oilers gave Hemsky ‘a million for every goal he scored.’

The problem was that Hemsky’s dismal performance stood in such stark contrast to his previous work in the NHL. The following are Hemsky’s basic statistics from the five years preceding 2011-12, as well as an average 47-game segment from that span. The last row has Hemsky’s numbers as of the date the Oilers re-signed him.

The difference is striking. Hemsky’s shots were down by a third, the number of shots taken that went in were down by half, and his assist totals were down by one-third.

The reasons for the slump are open to debate. But the Oilers needed to decide whether or not Hemsky’s rough 2011-12 represented the new normal for him, or if it was a temporary lull after which he could be expected to return to his traditional levels of production.

Hemsky’s played 36 games since then; I don’t think the answer is 100 percent clear yet.

It’s Not A Choice, It’s A Lack Of Options

The other issue, one that was obvious at the time, was that somebody was going to play Hemsky’s minutes. At the time, it was not possible to know that the Oilers would end up drafting first overall and picking Nail Yakupov, but even if they had known that ahead of time it would have been folly to expect a fresh-faced rookie to step in and add the kind of scoring Hemsky is capable of.

The free agent market was just as miserable. In terms of established offensive talent, there simply weren’t a lot of options. The Oilers could have gone hard after Zach Parise, or they would have been stuck trying to attract a Ray Whitney, Jaromir Jagr, Alex Semin or Jiri Hudler to town.

Right now, it looks like the 41-year old Jagr would have turned out pretty good. He got a one-year, $4.55 million contract from Dallas. The simple fact is that to replace Hemsky, the Oilers would have been forced to gamble that they could attract one of the few scoring options on the market, and they would be spending roughly the same money.

Alternatively, they could have let Hemsky go, and made a second line out of some combination of Ryan Smyth, Magnus Paajarvi, Teemu Hartikainen or Linus Omark (since at the time it seemed likely they would be picking after the Yakupov selection). While a possible choice, at some point the ‘dwell in the NHL basement and collect draft picks’ phase of a rebuild has to give way to a ‘make the team better’ segment, and keeping Hemsky was a necessary first step.

The Long Run

The Oilers opted to sign Hemsky to a bridge deal – they gave him money, but not term. His $5 million per season was a respectable figure, but the Oilers only committed to it for two seasons – allowing them flexibility if Hemsky failed to return to form, or if the combination of youth on expiring contracts/a falling salary cap (keep in mind that Hemsky was signed before the new CBA came into being) forced the team to shed dollars. It was a sensible choice at the time, and it looks pretty good in retrospect.

It seems likely that at some point in the near future, Hemsky will be a casualty of the salary cap, and the internal difficulties of keeping a trio of right wings – Hemsky, Yakupov and Jordan Eberle – in the system long-term. Hemsky’s the oldest of the group, and his injuries over the years have doubtless made the team hesitant to write him into the long-term plans. At this time next year, the Oilers will face the same decision they did a year ago – to sign Hemsky to a new deal, to trade him at the deadline, or to hang on to him and lose him for nothing in the summer.

If and when Hemsky does leave, I’ll be disappointed. For years, he’s been far and away the most entertaining player on the team, a uniquely gifted forward and on some nights one of the few reasons to watch a team bound for another year in the basement. He’s been called soft, and it’s been suggested at times that he’s lazy, but he’s a guy who seemingly never hesitated to take a hit to make a play, or sacrifice his body to retrieve a puck in the corner, and to me that says more about his on-ice character and his willingness than hit totals, interviews, or what time he leaves practice ever will.

But if Hemsky leaves town because it doesn’t make sense for the team to keep him, I’ll understand that. That could be the case a year from now. It certainly wasn’t the case a year ago.

PREVIOUSLY IN THIS SERIES

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#101 Gazmort
February 18 2013, 11:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Sanaa Montana

It doesn't really make sense, that was/is the problem.

There are two types of impasse - one wherein you accept that your opponent has equal skill and without agreeing to an end you are resigned to chasing each other around the board (ie. a king v king or king v king + knight scenario).

The other type of impasse is the one where you recognize the opponent is never going to get it, and it isn't worth continuing. If you are secure enough in your knowledge and convictions, you don't need to beat others over the head with it - not unlike trying to prove a point to a fish. They're never going to understand, but I can be pretty sure I'm right, even so.

:-)

I can DSF with the best of'em.

Avatar
#102 RSD
February 18 2013, 11:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Oiler Al wrote:

The answer is the question, its so obvious that even Tambelini might figure it out?

You have 4 high end right wingers.. Eberle, Yakapov, and Hemsky... all skillful, fast and expensive. Hemsky is the oldest of the bunch , so its obvious that he's the odd man out.

You might suggest well either him or Yak move to the left side, then you will have a cap issue.

I would wait to trade dead line, to see where the Oilers are, and also you get your best value at that point.

I would trade him for O Reily's rights , who would be your second line ctr, and Gagner would be the third line guy. Would give you three decent center men.

Ideally you would go for a D Man, but you wont get a top 4 D man for Hemsky.

Its unfortunate, but this team has a poor track record in drafting and more so developing players from within.[PS. lotto kids dont count as good drafting]

I agree with you: hemsky's value will be greatest at deadline but, if I'm trading for O' Riely he has to sign before the deal is done and it has to be under 5 mil. Honestly whom is really willing to part with their top 4 d-man, maybe NYI but I doubt it.

Avatar
#103 Walter Sobchak
February 19 2013, 12:42AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Sanaa Montana wrote:

Hall6, Eberle6, RNH5, J Schu5, Yakupov5, Hemsky4. Thats 31 in salary, and another 30-40 left to sign other players. Whats the problem?

That’s what you got? I did send you the link to capgeek correct?

RNH might, sign for 5 flat as might Schultz Jr, I doubt it very much, but ok, you then have Hemsky at a lower rate than he is signed for at the moment that would be incorrect, he will not go down. So call it 5 again.

Let’s assume Yakupov signs for 5. That’s 32 committed in two years.

But you haven’t signed.

1) Gagner-next year…… 2) Smid-next year…… 3) Jones-next year….. 4) Paajarvi-next year …….5) Hartikainen -next year……. 6) Petrell-next year or replacement…….. 7) Whitney-Next year or replacement top pairing defensive player! ……8) Sutton-next year or replacement…… 9) Fistric-next year or replacement……. 10) Vandevelde-next year or replacement……. 11) Peckham-Next year or replacement ……..12) Khabibulin-next year or replacement…….. 13 )Denis-Next year or replacement

Potter--N.Schultz---Eager--Belanger--Lander--Petry--Dubnyk--Smyth ALL the year after.

This is without Horcoffs contract as well.

This constitutes the bulk of your team that needs to be signed; your math is no good.

Not to mention your non-roster players, who next year can’t be placed in the minors any longer, as they will count against the cap. Someone has to go.

I don't want Hemsky to leave, it’s not about what you or I want, it's the reality of the cap system. I don’t care who we get for Hemsky, you seemed to think I want Hemsky traded, I don't, but reality suggest he will be the one traded.

Avatar
#104 EasyOil
February 19 2013, 03:51AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@hall2010

I'm afraid this isn't technically a forum, and there are no moderators as such, just the writers who will remove comments/ ban posters if they become genuinely offensive. Like him or not - i dont particularly - it never hurts to have someone around questioning moves by the Oilers. We're not blindly optimistic here, we're more realistically hopeful.

It should be noted that DSF is actually a disenchanted Oilers fan. He just wants management to be smart about things, like all of us, and lets face it they haven't exactly been a bunch of hockey Einsteins.

Avatar
#105 a lg dubl dubl
February 19 2013, 04:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
DSF wrote:

7 years, no playoffs.

7 years, In the playoffs every season.

Good call.

point takin

7 straight seasons in the playoffs and still cant get 1 cup....

way better team than the Oilers for those 7 season too

yep, Id still take 1 healthy Hemsky over 2 choke artists any day

At least Hemsky showed up the last time the Oilers made the playoffs.

Avatar
#106 djc
February 19 2013, 06:55AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
hall2010 wrote:

i've been following oilersnation for several years now, and have really enjoyed the various blogs, and comments from most members. however, the only reason why i have joined is to ask why DSF is allowed to continually comment and denigrate the oilers. i thought that this is forum to show your support for the oil. i understand that sometimes one may have opinions that are critical of the team and the moves of management, but if your sole purpose to comment here is to put down the organization and players by using ridiculous arguments backed by highly skewed and suspect facts and figures to support your negative view, then you really should find another place to comment. moderators please moderate. if DSF wants to spout off all this negativity, he/she should hop over to TSN and comment cuz it's not a pro oiler forum there. if DSF loves vancouver and minny so much, go and comment on their forums and give us a break from your utter nonsense. you don't troll on team's website/forum...go oilers!

DSF won't get blocked from Oilersnation because he generates page hits with his comments and flawed arguments. I'm not really sure what he gets out of it but maybe he is lonely and enjoys the attention.

Avatar
#107 pelhem grenville
February 19 2013, 08:58AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

'...I can DSF with the best of'em....'

omg you've made this bloody trolls' screen name into a VERB...

gazmort ... you are dead to me

Avatar
#108 Quicksilver ballet
February 19 2013, 09:48AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
hall2010 wrote:

i've been following oilersnation for several years now, and have really enjoyed the various blogs, and comments from most members. however, the only reason why i have joined is to ask why DSF is allowed to continually comment and denigrate the oilers. i thought that this is forum to show your support for the oil. i understand that sometimes one may have opinions that are critical of the team and the moves of management, but if your sole purpose to comment here is to put down the organization and players by using ridiculous arguments backed by highly skewed and suspect facts and figures to support your negative view, then you really should find another place to comment. moderators please moderate. if DSF wants to spout off all this negativity, he/she should hop over to TSN and comment cuz it's not a pro oiler forum there. if DSF loves vancouver and minny so much, go and comment on their forums and give us a break from your utter nonsense. you don't troll on team's website/forum...go oilers!

Hallsy, you find no problems with whats happened here over the last 6 yrs, no criticism whatsoever is warranted? There isn't enough kool-aid in the world for what Oilersnation has been through during these difficult times. DSF isn't the only one who holds their feet to the flames. Do you honestly believe whats happened here is acceptable? Someone should be levelling the playing field. DSF as well as other critiques here are very much Oilers fans, much like yourself.

Hall2010 eh....

What was your name here last month?

Avatar
#109 Smokey
February 19 2013, 10:14AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
hall2010 wrote:

i've been following oilersnation for several years now, and have really enjoyed the various blogs, and comments from most members. however, the only reason why i have joined is to ask why DSF is allowed to continually comment and denigrate the oilers. i thought that this is forum to show your support for the oil. i understand that sometimes one may have opinions that are critical of the team and the moves of management, but if your sole purpose to comment here is to put down the organization and players by using ridiculous arguments backed by highly skewed and suspect facts and figures to support your negative view, then you really should find another place to comment. moderators please moderate. if DSF wants to spout off all this negativity, he/she should hop over to TSN and comment cuz it's not a pro oiler forum there. if DSF loves vancouver and minny so much, go and comment on their forums and give us a break from your utter nonsense. you don't troll on team's website/forum...go oilers!

I think its great for rival nations to talk trash. DSF is welcome here, because I think many of us like people who come here and spew senile comments from their moma's basement.

Avatar
#110 The Towel Boy
February 19 2013, 10:50AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@hall2010

Just think of DSF as our resident "Crazy Cat Lady".

He may scream gibberish and throw a cat or two at you every now and then, but other than that he's quite harmless.

Avatar
#111 TigerUnderGlass
February 19 2013, 11:00AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Walter Sobchak wrote:

That’s what you got? I did send you the link to capgeek correct?

RNH might, sign for 5 flat as might Schultz Jr, I doubt it very much, but ok, you then have Hemsky at a lower rate than he is signed for at the moment that would be incorrect, he will not go down. So call it 5 again.

Let’s assume Yakupov signs for 5. That’s 32 committed in two years.

But you haven’t signed.

1) Gagner-next year…… 2) Smid-next year…… 3) Jones-next year….. 4) Paajarvi-next year …….5) Hartikainen -next year……. 6) Petrell-next year or replacement…….. 7) Whitney-Next year or replacement top pairing defensive player! ……8) Sutton-next year or replacement…… 9) Fistric-next year or replacement……. 10) Vandevelde-next year or replacement……. 11) Peckham-Next year or replacement ……..12) Khabibulin-next year or replacement…….. 13 )Denis-Next year or replacement

Potter--N.Schultz---Eager--Belanger--Lander--Petry--Dubnyk--Smyth ALL the year after.

This is without Horcoffs contract as well.

This constitutes the bulk of your team that needs to be signed; your math is no good.

Not to mention your non-roster players, who next year can’t be placed in the minors any longer, as they will count against the cap. Someone has to go.

I don't want Hemsky to leave, it’s not about what you or I want, it's the reality of the cap system. I don’t care who we get for Hemsky, you seemed to think I want Hemsky traded, I don't, but reality suggest he will be the one traded.

It's odd how you included AHL players and guys who won't be re-signed on your list.

Avatar
#112 Romulus' Apotheosis
February 19 2013, 11:15AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

C'mon JW... this is just straight up trolling.

Moving toward the deadline, this kind of stir the pot chatter has a place... but right now, you're just giving people an excuse to make bizarre comparisons.

Avatar
#113 DSF
February 19 2013, 11:31AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Hemsky has 29 shots on goal and has scored on 7 of them for a 24.1% shooting percentage.

If he was shooting at his career average of 11.6%, he would have 3 goals and 3 assists while leaking scoring chances and goals against.

Now, it's possible Hemsky has somehow become a much more lethal shooter but it's much more likely that he will regress to the mean.

Watch.

Avatar
#114 DSF
February 19 2013, 11:32AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
The Towel Boy wrote:

@hall2010

Just think of DSF as our resident "Crazy Cat Lady".

He may scream gibberish and throw a cat or two at you every now and then, but other than that he's quite harmless.

I hate cats...although I may be crazy.

Avatar
#115 Old Retired Guy
February 19 2013, 11:54AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

So I read the entire thread and here's what I heard...

1) Hemsky has been the Oilers best offensive threat for many seasons 2) Hemsky is not soft. 3) Hemsky is injury prone 4) Hemsky is likely to get moved at the deadline if he stays healthy and we are not competing for a playoffs position 5) Hemsky is likely to stay if we are competing for a playoff position ( He's under contract for another year, and so can be moved later) 6) Hemsky will only be moved if the deal makes sense/makes the Oilers a better team..more able/likely to compete for a cup

I would add:

7) Hemsky has significant value in a trade scenario....Martin Havlat was traded for Danny Heatley...(don't particularly like either player)..but Heatley was perceived as a prize at the time by most pundits...and....Hemsky has more value than Havlat...

Avatar
#116 DSF
February 19 2013, 11:56AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
EasyOil wrote:

I'm afraid this isn't technically a forum, and there are no moderators as such, just the writers who will remove comments/ ban posters if they become genuinely offensive. Like him or not - i dont particularly - it never hurts to have someone around questioning moves by the Oilers. We're not blindly optimistic here, we're more realistically hopeful.

It should be noted that DSF is actually a disenchanted Oilers fan. He just wants management to be smart about things, like all of us, and lets face it they haven't exactly been a bunch of hockey Einsteins.

This.

Exactly.

The very day the architects who drove the franchise I've supported since the WHA into the ditch are given their walking papers, you'll see a brand new DSF.

7 consecutive years out of the playoffs is an enormous failure only exceeded by the bozos who were running the Leafs.

That Burke was able to build a team that is now challenging for the division lead is a testament to the man whether or not you hate him.

All the while, the guys who authored the debacle in Edmonton not only keep their jobs but keep getting promotions, extensions and raises.

It boggles the mind.

Other perpetual losers like the Leafs, Panthers and Blue Jackets have at least had the sense to turf their under performing management teams and at least have a clear sense of direction.

In Edmonton...just keep losing and drafting.

That's a NYI rebuild.

Avatar
#117 Pucker
February 19 2013, 12:53PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

DSF is fine every once in while. I think he should be limited to maybe 4 posts per thread. It gets kind of ridiculous after a while.

Avatar
#118 John
February 19 2013, 01:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
DSF wrote:

This.

Exactly.

The very day the architects who drove the franchise I've supported since the WHA into the ditch are given their walking papers, you'll see a brand new DSF.

7 consecutive years out of the playoffs is an enormous failure only exceeded by the bozos who were running the Leafs.

That Burke was able to build a team that is now challenging for the division lead is a testament to the man whether or not you hate him.

All the while, the guys who authored the debacle in Edmonton not only keep their jobs but keep getting promotions, extensions and raises.

It boggles the mind.

Other perpetual losers like the Leafs, Panthers and Blue Jackets have at least had the sense to turf their under performing management teams and at least have a clear sense of direction.

In Edmonton...just keep losing and drafting.

That's a NYI rebuild.

I completely agree with you about the management. It is pretty pathetic that instead of firing people you just give them promotions because they are apart of the "family". That is no way to run a business. However, I think your comparison of EDM to the NYI is a bit stretching. I think EDM will become a good team in the next year or so while the NYI will just continue to rot. The only difference is, is that EDM got extremly lucky getting 3 first overall draft picks and Schultz. This had nothing to do with management and they should all be fired, but to think that EDM won't succeed just isn't accurate. The team will get better even though management really didn't do anything.

Avatar
#119 SteelStewart
February 19 2013, 02:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I've loved this guy since day 1 and always will. He's got endless talent and has always been exciting to watch and cheer for.

Avatar
#120 pelhem grenville
February 19 2013, 05:07PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

...how does one get a private "offline" conversation with this fellow whose urine spray sounds feminine?

Comments are closed for this article.