Why it seems unlikely that the Nashville Predators would trade Shea Weber

Jonathan Willis
May 01 2013 08:55AM

It’s (an understandable) dream of Oilers fans to see Shea Weber traded to Edmonton. Not only is he from Western Canada, big, strong and capable, but he’d fill the #1 defenceman hole that Edmonton has had since Chris Pronger left town.

Those dreams seem destined to go unfulfilled.

Get Used To Disappointment

Why would Nashville trade one of the league’s precious few franchise defenders? The answer always seems to be “they’re a small market club and they can’t afford him.” By their actions, though, it seems clear that the Predators have decided they can’t afford not to pay him.

The Economics of a Trade

Shea Weber signed his current contract – via a Philadelphia Flyers offer sheet – on July 19, 2012, forcing the Predators to either match and hang on to Weber for at least a year, or decline to match and accept four first-round picks in exchange for Weber’s services. The Flyers made it as difficult as possible for Nashville by structuring the contract to be extremely front-loaded.

No NHL player made more money in 2012-13 than Weber. More than that, Weber’s contract is structured to be heavily bonus-intensive – featuring a $1 million base salary and a $13 million signing bonus for each of the first four years. The signing bonuses mean that by the time Weber could be traded by the Predators, they will have paid $27 million of the $110 million on his contract – just slightly under one-quarter of his total contract in the first year.

Facing a $110 million decision, one has to think the Predators weighed the cost. None of these ramifications were unknown at the time; the Predators knew what they were getting into matching that offer sheet. If it made sense to sign him then, it’s hard to imagine they’re going to change their mind and move him after having already taken the worst lumps.

Certainly that’s the message general manager David Poile has always emphasized – asked about the possibility of a trade by CBC’s Elliotte Friedman in April, he made no secret as to his view:

We have a franchise goaltender and the best defenceman in the NHL ... We are building our team around them.

Ultimately, it comes down to this: either the Predators made a terrible mistake, Poile’s being disingenuous, and the team plans to try and get a better return than four first round picks after spending $27 million for 48 games or they really have no plans to trade Weber. The latter seems more likely to be reality than the former. None of that means the Oilers shouldn't ask, but it does mean not much is likely to come of it. 

Recently around the Nation Network

74b7cedc5d8bfbe88cf071309e98d2c3
Jonathan Willis is a freelance writer. He currently works for Oilers Nation, Sportsnet, the Edmonton Journal and Bleacher Report. He's co-written three books and worked for myriad websites, including Grantland, ESPN, The Score, and Hockey Prospectus. He was previously the founder and managing editor of Copper & Blue.
Avatar
#51 GVBlackhawk
May 01 2013, 12:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Ducey wrote:

You have another year of development for J Schultz, Petry and Smid and get rid of whatever BS system they had last year and they will be fine.

Marincin is 6'5", has decent speed, put up 30 pts in 69 games in OKC and led the team in +/-with a +20 in his rookie year. He is going to be a good player.

Petry, Smid, and the Schultzes are fine in the 3-6 positions. None of them are top pairing guys at this point; they are not prepared to handle the opposition toughs.

Marincin posted some good numbers in the AHL (partially aided by playing with JSchultz in the first half), but that does not tell the whole story. He has some kinks in his defensive game that have to be ironed out before making the jump to NHL.

The Oilers have been rushing prospects to the big club for so long now that many people think this is the norm. The most successful teams let their players develop in the minors for 2-3 years before they bring them up.

Avatar
#52 blueorangekoolaid
May 01 2013, 12:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Would New Jersey be interested in a deal for our pick so that they can sacrifice their pick this year from the Kovalchuk fiasco? Maybe they would work out something like Larsson and their 1st next year for our first this year and another piece? Maybe Hemsky. Then they can burn their pick this year and still draft high. Replace Larsson with this year's pick and have Hemsky. Maybe their 2014 1st could be conditional on number of games played for Hemmer. So it's basically our 1st for Larsson and then Hemsky for a conditional 1st next year plus the freedom to pay their Kovalchuk penalty. Not sure if they had to declare their intention to sacrifice that pick already or do they have until the draft to decide?

Avatar
#53 Quicksilver ballet
May 01 2013, 12:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

With JD and Jarmo Kekäläinen taking over in Columbus, maybe they're not all that sold on Ryan Murray. A kinder, gentler mini version of Shea Weber?

Kevin Quinn, Louis Debrusk and Jack Micheals along with a third rounder, perhaps? Stauffer could drive them, he's not doing anything now. Would be a few tanks of gas and a lot of twinkies, but that Stauffer guy is willing to say/do anything for the sake of a paycheque it appears.

Avatar
#54 madjam
May 01 2013, 12:54PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

P.K.Subban with a good contract . Secondary for next couple of years that would help is Markov . Subban and Markov seem to have differences .

Avatar
#55 Yak Attack
May 01 2013, 12:59PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
SrCain wrote:

So DSF, when a team is picking first overall for 3 yrs straight, and starting a rebuild, what do you do if the majority of top ranked prospects are forwards in those years. Like they were with oilers?

My issue is that it is very easy to pick first in the first round. Where are all of our early second and third round picks ?

Avatar
#56 Cody anderson
May 01 2013, 01:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I heard Tyler Myers had an off season. He has the potential to be a Pronger. Could he be pried out of Buffalo?

Avatar
#57 DSF
May 01 2013, 01:15PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

With JD and Jarmo Kekäläinen taking over in Columbus, maybe they're not all that sold on Ryan Murray. A kinder, gentler mini version of Shea Weber?

Kevin Quinn, Louis Debrusk and Jack Micheals along with a third rounder, perhaps? Stauffer could drive them, he's not doing anything now. Would be a few tanks of gas and a lot of twinkies, but that Stauffer guy is willing to say/do anything for the sake of a paycheque it appears.

Sorry...saw a recent interview with JD...he is very sold on Murray.

Avatar
#58 oilerjed
May 01 2013, 01:17PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

@Jerod

"Adam Larsson huge upside, NJ needs forwards, may be the right timing for a deal."

I have to say I like this idea of sending our offensive players to the East Rather then to a western conference foe.

Avatar
#59 mayorpoop
May 01 2013, 01:19PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

the conversation just has to start with "Omark...." and hook line and sinker you got yourself a Weber.*

*trading for Weber is a Kevin Lowe move and just look at our success with those.

#noWeber

Avatar
#60 Cody anderson
May 01 2013, 01:25PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I don't see Larsson avaiable other then for a massive overy pay. I would jump at a trade that included Hemsky, our 2014 1st rounder and a middling prospect.

What would it take? What would you be willing to give up?

Think about our back end in a couple of years if you didn't have to give up a Dman to get him

Larsson - J Schultz

Smid - Petry

Klefbom - Marincin

Looks like a playoff D-corps to me.

Avatar
#61 Quicksilver ballet
May 01 2013, 01:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
DSF wrote:

Sorry...saw a recent interview with JD...he is very sold on Murray.

DAMMIT!

I might as well go power rake the bloody lawn. These discussions are going nowhere.

Avatar
#62 headmetal
May 01 2013, 01:28PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

no one has brought up any of the following names?! I think these are more of conversation pieces than Weber: - Yandle - Byfuglien - Green - Hamhuis

All on teams that could use some pieces. Pricey, but we have assets and I agree with Quick that we need to make some drastic moves

Avatar
#63 madjam
May 01 2013, 01:34PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
headmetal wrote:

no one has brought up any of the following names?! I think these are more of conversation pieces than Weber: - Yandle - Byfuglien - Green - Hamhuis

All on teams that could use some pieces. Pricey, but we have assets and I agree with Quick that we need to make some drastic moves

I'll add Bieksa to that list for starters , and would not be surprised to see a deal for J.Bernier or even Luongo either .

Avatar
#64 oilerjed
May 01 2013, 01:38PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@headmetal

I hate to quote stories that are true speculation but tsn was talking about Winnepeg's need to make some changes and byfuglien's name came up as a possible they would get rid of to get quality back. He would definetly be a good start here on wing or D. Wonder what he would cost?

Avatar
#65 Spydyr
May 01 2013, 01:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
3
props

Some people feel the Oilers can get Weber for Gagner, Hemsky and the rights to Omark.

Give it a rest. No more white whales.

If Weber was to ever be traded the cost would be one if not two of the kids. There would also be 29 other teams upping the price.

Just let the dream die folks.

Avatar
#66 The Soup Fascist
May 01 2013, 01:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props
DSF wrote:

Sorry...saw a recent interview with JD...he is very sold on Murray.

But I am not sure what else you would expect him to say .... "Fellas, this guy is smallish and potentially overrated" ??

I have had the opportunity to watch Murray play since Bantam and he has been an exceptional hockey player - no BS. His greatest asset is that he does everything well.

The concern I have is that he doesn't do any ONE thing exceptionally great. That could be trouble at the NHL level. If he becomes the second coming of Scott Niedermeyer, that would be wonderful. I fear though, that he may track closer to a Kris Russell type of player.

I will not be disappointed if I am wrong, he seems like a good kid. But I think Yak will ultimately be the more impactful player.

Avatar
#67 Butters
May 01 2013, 01:41PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

It sounds like the arena deal is going to be quashed next week. This from David Staples whom is always optimistic.

We might not even have a team to complain about. sigh

Avatar
#68 Reg Dunlop
May 01 2013, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Cody anderson

Consensus seems that a valuable piece like Larson or Weber or Pietrangelo would require a big overpay to obtain. I put Hall and Eberle in this category. Trade one of them to the east(NYR) and demand an overpay that balances the oil skillset(DelZotto, MacDonagh and Stepan). Lets be on the good side of an overpay for once.

Avatar
#69 The Real Scuba Steve
May 01 2013, 01:42PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
GVBlackhawk wrote:

Petry, Smid, and the Schultzes are fine in the 3-6 positions. None of them are top pairing guys at this point; they are not prepared to handle the opposition toughs.

Marincin posted some good numbers in the AHL (partially aided by playing with JSchultz in the first half), but that does not tell the whole story. He has some kinks in his defensive game that have to be ironed out before making the jump to NHL.

The Oilers have been rushing prospects to the big club for so long now that many people think this is the norm. The most successful teams let their players develop in the minors for 2-3 years before they bring them up.

The Oilers are not like other teams nobody wants 10 years of missing the playoffs.

Avatar
#70 madjam
May 01 2013, 01:43PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Yak Attack wrote:

My issue is that it is very easy to pick first in the first round. Where are all of our early second and third round picks ?

I like 6-2 Anton Slepychev for second round to compliment possible acquisition of V.Nichushkin . Yakupov would probably flourish with those two .

Avatar
#71 The Soup Fascist
May 01 2013, 01:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
madjam wrote:

I like 6-2 Anton Slepychev for second round to compliment possible acquisition of V.Nichushkin . Yakupov would probably flourish with those two .

Was Slepyshev not available in last year's draft, or am I thinking of someone else?

Avatar
#72 Tikkanese
May 01 2013, 02:10PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Cody anderson wrote:

I don't see Larsson avaiable other then for a massive overy pay. I would jump at a trade that included Hemsky, our 2014 1st rounder and a middling prospect.

What would it take? What would you be willing to give up?

Think about our back end in a couple of years if you didn't have to give up a Dman to get him

Larsson - J Schultz

Smid - Petry

Klefbom - Marincin

Looks like a playoff D-corps to me.

So you want us to have the softest D in the history of the NHL?

Avatar
#73 Freewheeling Fred
May 01 2013, 02:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
1
props

Back in 2006 when the Oilers traded for chris pronger who would have believed that could happen.The city was very excited. We need another monster trade to get this city pumped about the Oilers.We need Shea Webber. Next year with realignment the opposition will include some big tough players. The current d corp would get manhandled. With the young d coming in Webber would be a great mentor.Offer Nashville Gagner Petry a prospect and a first. Get er done Mac

Avatar
#74 Quicksilver ballet
May 01 2013, 02:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

The Canucks are over 64 million next season, and only 17 players signed, If Bieksa waved his NT, what would it cost to take both Kevin and Ballard off their hands? Buy out Ballard, this would slice 9 mill of their committed payroll going into next season. Allowing them to fill out their roster.

Our moving Omark dreams aren't dead yet.

Avatar
#75 Lochenzo
May 01 2013, 02:22PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I'm very interested to see what Florida does. they will lose Stephen Weiss this summer and I think they would be in the market for a skilled centre.

Losing the draft lottery means that they will draft one of MacKinnon or Drouin. Even though they could fill that need with MacKinnon, for some reason I'm thinking Tallon will take Drouin. Tallon really likes skill, and made the right decision with Patrick Kane over Turris and the power forward, JVR.

Gunbranson is top young dog on that blueline. Kulikov would be available and I think MacT should sell the virtues of Sam Gagner as a centre.

Avatar
#76 David
May 01 2013, 02:30PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Tikkanese

Larsson would cost probably Eberle. Nj might throw something else in but not much.

Avatar
#77 madjam
May 01 2013, 02:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Due to circumstances will Spezza or Vanek be available ?

Avatar
#78 Cody anderson
May 01 2013, 02:35PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Tikkanese

This D looks a hell of a lot better then what we have had the last 5 yrs. Sure it is not the most physical D-corps, but shortest guy is 6'2" lightest in 2 years will likely be J Schultz who will probably get over 200 lbs.

They should all be legit top 4 guys and potentially a few may end up being top 2 dmen.

Avatar
#79 Cody anderson
May 01 2013, 02:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
David wrote:

Larsson would cost probably Eberle. Nj might throw something else in but not much.

Do you think we would be stronger as a team if we traded Eberle and Hemsky for a return of Larsson and Zajac?

Avatar
#80 madjam
May 01 2013, 02:46PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
The Soup Fascist wrote:

Was Slepyshev not available in last year's draft, or am I thinking of someone else?

Your correct because most/all felt he would not come over last year . He's 6-1 and 195 by the way - I stand corrected . Currently slotted at ranking 39 . Maybe same problem with Nicushkin to be honest - risky pick no doubt .

I'll add another pick Oilers by MacT. own admission is 38th ranked Eric Comrie for goal and could be a good second round pick .

Avatar
#81 headmetal
May 01 2013, 02:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

build from net out...we need a challenger for backup (Bernier or bought out Lou or pry Khudobin for cheap) then really concentrate on a top level Dman. We have prospects, but need to acquire some Vet talent to teach our kids.

Remember back in our run what Oates and Peca did for the Centers. What Pronger taught our D corp?!? Trading some of the kids may be needed to get the pieces, however I think picks and prospects will be just as well received providing we do not waste other GMs time and make some hockey trades

Avatar
#82 Tikkanese
May 01 2013, 02:51PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Our D needs a LOT of work. People have to stop sugar coating how "good" our D really is. Let's face facts.

Smid is overrated. Yes, he's great at blocking shots but that's really it other than being ok at the PK. Zero offense. He thinks he's tough but he doesn't scare anybody with that glass jaw of his. He would be a 5-6 D on a good team. He is worth keeping around.

J. Schultz is our Mike Green. Just offense. He's soft, never hits, never blocks shots. When he's on he sure is fun to watch though. Maybe in time he'll add shot blocking to his resume like John Carlson did this year. That would be great.

Petry is a Mac-T non-factor. He kills penalties ok. Does he do anything else? Nope. He's the Petrell of our D. I wouldn't mind him moving along to bring in someone with more elements to their game.

Klefbom, Marincin, Musil, Gernat, etc all need at least two if not 3-4 years in the minors and they are all "maybes" until they make it, so no point hanging your hats on any of them. Klefbom Klefbom Klefbom is all I hear everywhere, the kid's barely played in the last 3 years, what does everyone expect? Prepare to wait on him. If he makes the Oil next season we are in deep trouble.

Nick Schultz? He's just a veteran stop-gap. Works hard, good in the room, serviceable on the ice... nothing special.

Mark Fistric? Probably not used properly while here but I would hope we could improve on him too.

Weber? Most of you underestimate how much of a pipe dream this is. The cost would most certainly include one of the core 4 plus a lot more. This is Shea freaking Weber people.

Avatar
#83 Tikkanese
May 01 2013, 03:02PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Cody anderson wrote:

This D looks a hell of a lot better then what we have had the last 5 yrs. Sure it is not the most physical D-corps, but shortest guy is 6'2" lightest in 2 years will likely be J Schultz who will probably get over 200 lbs.

They should all be legit top 4 guys and potentially a few may end up being top 2 dmen.

Yes it looks a lot better than our last 5 years, but that's not saying much. Gord Mark would be an improvement over a lot of our D!

They may all be 6'2"+ but the only possible physical guy in your list is Marincin. Schultz and Larsson are the only offensive types and the rest will most likely end up being all Defensive D-Men and mostly soft at that. Not a good balance unless we have Barry Trotz as our coach.

Avatar
#84 Will
May 01 2013, 03:05PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I agree that Weber is out of reach; moreover I really don't think our management would want to take on that contract and be hamstrung when it comes time for the rest of the wunderkids to be signed. I like whoever started talking about alternative names like Yandle. There are good D out there, not named Weber, that would take an asset or two going back the other way, but might not cost a wunderkid, and those are the type we should look to get.

I keep saying swap first round picks with Philly and package Gagner for Coutier (who isn't a D I know), but I wonder fi this deal could be made with Phoenix for Yandle? Obviously that leaves a pretty big hole at second line centre, but in FA this year, what is more difficult to come by, good D or a replacement / upgrade on Gagner? I know the Gagner talk is boring now, but we keep talking about it because to get what we want, it would likely cost us at least Gagner. He seems to be the piece fans would be willing to give up, and maybe even the piece that has some actual value to other teams.

My guess is if they don't trade our first overall outright for someone on the same kind of level of Yandle, they will pick Monahan if available, if not they'll take one of the big D. Question to ON, would you take Nishckinin if he fell to seventh knowing he'sgot a bit of an attitude and could bolt back to the KHL anytime?

Avatar
#85 Eddie Shore
May 01 2013, 03:14PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Did people actually believe the Preds were going to pay $26,000,000 and then trade him?

Avatar
#86 **
May 01 2013, 03:23PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

the price of bringing Weber to Edmonton would be too prohibitive for the Oilers at this point. It would probably end up hurting the team in the long run. With the price the Preds GM would be asking for, the Oil can get at least 3 decent players who's sum of the parts would have more impact than Weber and it wouldn't strand the team down the road.

Avatar
#87 madjam
May 01 2013, 03:26PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

We are all hoping for a blockbuster trade or two , when MacT. said that was not what the are planning if I remember him correctly . He is out for complimentary players to surround our stars - not much mention of any so called superstars ! Doesn't appear that they are seeking big stars unless the unlikely deal falls into their laps . Lets face it after 7 years of nothing falling into their laps , it's doubtful it will for next year either .

Lets get back to roll players that can upgrade present personnel not of the big star variety .

Avatar
#88 The Soup Fascist
May 01 2013, 03:50PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
headmetal wrote:

build from net out...we need a challenger for backup (Bernier or bought out Lou or pry Khudobin for cheap) then really concentrate on a top level Dman. We have prospects, but need to acquire some Vet talent to teach our kids.

Remember back in our run what Oates and Peca did for the Centers. What Pronger taught our D corp?!? Trading some of the kids may be needed to get the pieces, however I think picks and prospects will be just as well received providing we do not waste other GMs time and make some hockey trades

Oates and Peca were mutually exclusive. Oates arrived a couple years before the 2006 run. His single year was a non-event and he was clearly done. I can't say if he added value to our centers at the time - I will defer to your knowledge.

Peca was another one year project 05-06. His regular season play was underwhelming if I remember right. He did turn it up a bit it the playoffs though. Again, I have no idea on how much he imparted on the other three centers, Stoll, Horcoff and Reasoner.

Pronger was in a different class, IMO. Despite being an all-world jerk he made everyone better. I am not sure Oates or Peca came close to having that impact.

Hopefully MacT remembers that time in his past and acknowledges the immediate impact of an elite defenceman.

Avatar
#89 Jerconjake
May 01 2013, 04:24PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

For what it's worth, Dreger reported that the Predators were working on a Weber trade at the time the offer sheet was signed:

https://twitter.com/DarrenDreger/status/225817338795155456

The money they spent in 2013 was an investment for the future, but that contract is a serious anchor for the organization. If they got the right package I think it could happen.

Avatar
#90 Wax Man Riley
May 01 2013, 04:29PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Quicksilver ballet wrote:

Maybe you guys are right. Lowe will never pull a Pronger out of his hat again. Why even bother raising expectations for the third highest ticket prices in the league.

This is as good as it gets Edmonton. Just making the playoffs again is as good as it gets for this most northern outpost.

Weber to Edmonton, the laughing stock of the NHL....what a laugher! Will the last overpaid, underachieving veteran playing out his golden years here, please turn out the lights before leaving town.

Quitters rejoice, and pile on!

Oh My GAWD!!!

Le tit go Quicks. It has nothing to do with giving up or accepting mediocrity. It has everything to do with Nashville saying:

"Ummm we just ate 25% of the best defenseman in the league's contract. We have a world-class goalie AND the aforementioned defenseman and we will build around those.

Why don't we trade for Crosby and Malkin then? Hey... if Gretzky can be traded, right?

Avatar
#91 Wax Man Riley
May 01 2013, 04:31PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Quicksilver ballet

By the way... hiking is really just walking where it is OK to pee.

Sometimes seniors hike by accident...

Avatar
#92 TigerUnderGlass
May 01 2013, 04:37PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@ Willis

One factor to consider is that the Preds are in an a different situation than they were when they signed him.

At the time they were a team who had just come off 3 strong seasons with a legitimate expectation that they would make some noise in the playoffs in the future. Weber was retained to maintain that.

Now they have missed the playoffs and did not have a good season at all.

Is it not fair that a team coming off 3 good seasons would have more motivation to retain Weber than a team coming off the season they just had given the financial implications?

I'm not saying this necessarily means they want to trade him, but it does mean their intentions to keep him at the time could have been altered over the last year.

It's not definitive but it would have to be a motivating factor.

Avatar
#93 Will
May 01 2013, 04:39PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I think people are also forgetting Nashville picked up a really good prospect this year, and is about to pick up another one.

They have an experienced goalie defence tandem, maybe one of the best in the league, and they are about to get some young, and rather large, talent up front. Not to mention they have one of the better coaches in the league. If they can add a bit of scoring and some depth defence in the summer time, they could likely be right back in the mix in the West.

Avatar
#94 madjam
May 01 2013, 04:40PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Soup Fascist : I wrote to a Journal writer who agreed with me that Peca and Pronger were not doing much here and vastly underperforming. I commented both were looking like they were on vacation here . Pronger by New Years had penalty minutes resembling a Lady Byng contender . Not until we added the additional personnel at trade deadline did either of them start living up to their potential . Maybe personnel problems had a lot to do with it .

Avatar
#95 Wax Man Riley
May 01 2013, 04:48PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Yak Attack wrote:

My issue is that it is very easy to pick first in the first round. Where are all of our early second and third round picks ?

This is the truth right here. 1st overall is pretty easy.

71st overall is a bit tougher. That amateur scouting department better be in it's game.

Avatar
#96 MarcusBillius
May 01 2013, 05:09PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

Jason, don't you think a better argument would be to look at the size of his salary, point out his gigantic cap hit for the next half century, and then ask all our genius Oilers fans who want him "where the hell do you think we'll find the money to sign Nuge, Yakupov, and Schultz - and maybe Gagner?"

Avatar
#97 Will
May 01 2013, 05:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

@Wax Man Riley

I think we've been drafting pretty good in late late rounds in the last few years. Where we're falling down is in the second and third, likely because there seems to have been an upper management mandate for a coke machine. I would imagine the scouts are doing there job but are being overruled by the Oilers mission to get a Lucic of their very own.

I would be way, way more upset at blowing a pick in the first round over our inability to find Jamie Benns in the draft.

Sam Gagner 6th in 2007 (second in points from his draft year) Jordan Eberle 22nd in 2008 Paajarvi 10th in 2009 (we missed out on some good D, but this is still a strong pick) Hall 1st in 2010 Nuge 1st in 2011 Klefbomb 19 in 2011 (looking at what was drafted above and below him, this might have been a great pick) Yak 1st in 2012

So which would you rather, us blowing these first rounds picks or us not finding gems in the depth picks?

Avatar
#98 Quicksilver ballet
May 01 2013, 05:49PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Eddie Shore wrote:

Did people actually believe the Preds were going to pay $26,000,000 and then trade him?

Sometimes you just gotta do what you gotta do when ownership needs/wants to cut costs.

It would get the Preds off the hook for the other 84 million over the balance of that contract. Nothing screams, we're in it to win it like being 12 mill under the cap every year for the last 5 yrs. Darn right I believed the Preds may want to get out from under that deal. With no playoff home dates for the foreseeable future, they could easily change their direction. It's a safe bet Weber doesn't want to be a part of another 5 yrs outside of the playoffs. The Preds moving Weber out of need, or Weber wanting the Preds to move him, either way, it's just a matter of time. When Gretzky signed his deal to remain an Oiler till 1999, we all thought he'd be an Oiler forever as well.

84 million is a couple dollars more than 26 million there Mikey.

Avatar
#99 Spydyr
May 01 2013, 06:12PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props
Freewheeling Fred wrote:

Back in 2006 when the Oilers traded for chris pronger who would have believed that could happen.The city was very excited. We need another monster trade to get this city pumped about the Oilers.We need Shea Webber. Next year with realignment the opposition will include some big tough players. The current d corp would get manhandled. With the young d coming in Webber would be a great mentor.Offer Nashville Gagner Petry a prospect and a first. Get er done Mac

Can we also trade Hemsky, Horcoff, a prospect and a first for Crosby?

Get er done Mac

Avatar
#100 michael
May 01 2013, 06:13PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
0
props

I get so sick of these articles about trading for Weber. Half the wags would trade Hall,RNH and Eberle for one player. Stop it already.Enough of the madness. Reality to check. Stop trying to cut off your nose to spite your face. In a word be patient. I implore you no more of these EA sports trades. Gretzky never worried about defense. Ask those of us who watched the 80s Oilers light up teams for 5 goals a night on a regular basis. Sure the goalies are better now. The players bigger. Faster. More skilled. By why in Robin Brownlee's name would you give up any of the top 6 for this guy. Never mind the cap hit and contract is so obscene that it boggles the mind. Roberto Luongo anyone? Ilya Brzgalov? Scott Gomez? Shawn Horcoff?. These are prime example of why you don't take on that kind of albatross. New jersey has to forfeit their first roung pick either this year or next in punishment for the Kovalchuck contract. Look at Kipper. One year left at 1.5? He'd rather retire than play for chump change. You really think Weber will play out that contract? Really? Give your heads a shake MacT is smarter than you give him credit for.

Comments are closed for this article.