Future Free Agents: Kevin Shattenkirk

Cam Lewis
December 04 2016 02:06PM

Future Free Agents is a semi-regular feature on NHLNumbers profiling players from 2017's potential free agency class. 

Since Brent Burns inked a wooly mammoth of a contract extension with the San Jose Sharks a couple of weeks ago, the spotlight shifts to Kevin Shattenkirk

The St. Louis Blues’ right-handed, puck-moving defenceman is now far and away the best blue liner set to become available on the free agent market this summer. While Shattenkirk isn’t quite the generational talent that Burns is, he’s still one of the game’s best at producing offence from the blue line and would be a welcome addition to just about every team in the league. 

Unfortunately, if speculation is correct, there may actually only be one team he’s interested in playing for. 

How good is he? 

Ever since breaking into the league with the Colorado Avalanche back in 2010, Shattenkirk has been one of the league’s best offensive defencemen. He scored 43 points with the Blues and Avs in his rookie season, and has since put up at least 0.50 points-per-game every season since then. 

Over the past three seasons, his 107 points ranks 15th among defencemen, and his 0.70 points-per-game over that span puts him sixth in the league behind only Karlsson, Letang, Burns, Subban, and Josi. You know, the names that always come up when talking about elite offensive defencemen.

Shattenkirk’s shot attempt numbers over the past three seasons are right where you’d expect them to be based on his boxcar stats, as his 53.4 Corsi For percentage ranks 18th among defencemen over the past three seasons. But he does play for the Blues, who are consistently in the running for the Corsi Hockey League championship trophy. So how much credit should he be given? 

He certainly isn’t the possession driving engine behind the Blues machine, but he also isn’t just along for the ride. He has positive relative possession numbers, helping the Blues generate more shot attempts when he’s on than they do when he’s off. But, unsurprisingly, the team gives also up more shot attempts against than they do when he’s watching. 

What this suggests is that the Blues open up their game when Shattenkirk (and the team’s other offensive players) are on the ice. It also validates the common result you’ll get from using the eye test on Shattenkirk, which is that while he does produce at a high level, he’s prone to some terrible, mind-boggling turnovers and defensive lapses. But that’s the reality of opening it up and being a player who creates. Many times it works in your team’s favour, but you’re inevitably going to give something up the other way. 

I mean, obviously it’s difficult to say exactly how much individual value he has to driving the team’s offence, but however you shake it, the team generates more chances and scores more goals with him on the ice than they do when he isn’t. 

How much is he going to cost? 

There are two pretty solid comparables that immediately come to mind when thinking about possible contract for Kevin Shattenkirk. Kris Letang and Keith Yandle, two other defencemen known for their ability to produce offence, both signed long-term deals that ate up exclusively unrestricted free agency years somewhat recently. 

Letang signed an eight-year extension worth $7.25 million annually with the Penguins back in July 2013 a year before he was set to hit unrestricted free agency, and Yandle signed a seven-year deal worth $6.35 million annually with the Panthers last summer in his first time hitting the open market. Shattenkirk isn’t quite as good as Letang, who sits just behind Erik Karlsson for point-per-game among defencemen over the past three seasons, but he’s better than Yandle based on both underlying numbers and production. 

The place to start is somewhere in the middle between Letang’s $7.25 million and Yandle’s $6.35 million annual salaries with a similar term of seven or eight years. So let’s say $7 million annually over seven years for Shattenkirk’s free agent contract. 

Can St. Louis afford it? 

Probably not.

There are two things going on here that suggests Shattenkirk will not be playing for the Blues beyond the end of this season. The first is easy enough to recognize when looking at their current cap situation. The second requires a little more investigation and is open for some interpretation. I’ll tackle the first one now and get to the other one later. 

The Blues already have a significant amount of money tied into their core, long-term investments. Vladimir Tarasenko, Alex Steen, Jaden Schwartz, Jori Lehtera, Alex Pietrangelo, Jay Bouwmeester, and Jake Allen are all locked up for at last two more seasons after this one for a combined cap hit of roughly $42 million. Add in Paul Stastny and David Perron’s contracts that each have one more year left on them and that number quickly jumps to $53 million. 

And then you have Colton Parayko. A third-round pick back in 2012, Parayko kind of popped out of nowhere if you aren’t somebody who pays attention to the Blues closely. He broke into the NHL last year after playing three NCAA seasons with Alaska-Fairbanks, scoring 33 points in 79 games while leading the Blues with a ridiculously impressive 54.8 Corsi For percentage at even strength. 

Parayko’s entry-level contract expires at the end of the season, and the Blues are obviously going to want to lock him up to a long-term deal. While he doesn’t have the draft pedigree of someone like Seth Jones or Aaron Ekblad, both of whom signed long-term, post-ELC deals recently, he’s in that same category of young, excellent all around defencemen. 

So if you take that $53 million figure attached to the Blues’ seven core players, toss in Shattenkirk’s realistic new annual cap hit of $7 million from earlier, you don’t even have to start crunching numbers on Parayko to realize this isn’t going to work. 

I mean, sure, it’s conceivable that they could move or dump some contracts to older players and squeeze in both Shattenkirk and Parayko to this already tight financial puzzle, but if the Blues had realistic faith in their ability to fit Shattenkirk into their long term cap picture, his name probably wouldn’t come up in trade rumours every week. 

If he hits the open market...

Even if the financial stuff make sense, which it doesn't, there’s reason to believe Shattenkirk wants to use his free agency to play elsewhere. Here's where we get to the second reason he won't be with the Blues beyond this season that I mentioned earlier. 

This summer, a report came out that claimed Shattenkirk expected the Blues to trade him before the beginning of the season. This largely had to do with the fact Shattenkirk wasn't interested in signing an extension at the time, and general manager Doug Armstrong wanted to get something of value for him before he walked away for nothing the following summer. 

Last week, Elliotte Friedman mentioned Shattenkirk in 30 Thoughts, claiming that teams believe that the defenceman is interested in signing with the New York Rangers in free agency. That certainly isn't surprising, considering Shattenkirk grew up in New York, he refers to himself as a "New Yorker at heart" in his Twitter bio, and spoke glowingly about the chance to play in front of family and friends at Madison Square Garden in an article on nhl.com in 2014

Of course, like the Blues, the Rangers don't exactly have the most rosy cap situation, and fitting Shattenkirk to an already expensive blue line is going to require some wheeling and dealing. Also, this whole going home thing could also just be a bunch of nonsense and wishful thinking, as we've seen many, many times before with star free agents rejecting the homecoming narrative and sticking with their original club. 

There's also many, many other teams that are going to be lining up to throw a fat wad of cash at Shattenkirk this summer if they get the chance. Just like I pointed out in the Burns free agency article, right-handed, offence-producing defencemen are a highly coveted asset. In that 30 Thoughts article, Friedman mentioned multiple teams had already tried to acquire Shattenkirk from the Blues last summer, and I'm sure those teams will also be getting in touch with his agent on July 1, 2017. 

/

Conclusion 

What we can say for sure is that Kevin Shattenkirk is going to be a highly coveted free agent this summer. With Brent Burns signed, he's far and away the best defenceman on the market, and, as we know, a handful of teams in the NHL will be tripping over themselves to try to get a highly productive, right-handed defencemen on their team. 

Also, we can assume with some certainly that the Blues simply can't afford to keep Shattenkirk around. They already have a tremendous amount of cash tied into a core group of players, and they also need to figure out a new deal for young star defenceman Colton Parayko. 

Multiple teams, including the Edmonton Oilers, Boston Bruins, and Arizona Coyotes showed interest in him last summer when he was available via trade, but nothing panned out. Whether those deals fell flat because St. Louis was asking for too much or because Shattenkirk explicitly stated he wouldn't sign an extension with any of those teams is up for debate, but there is some reason to believe that he has a destination in mind and wants to take a crack at a New York homecoming. 

81281fbb32a5d59ff021c88538283692
Sociology graduate. Managing editor for NHLNumbers & guy for The Jays Nation. @cooom.
Avatar
#1 giddy
December 04 2016, 02:30PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
29
props

Did he not explicitly state that he wanted to play in the east? Most likely going to Boston I bet.

Avatar
#2 the dope $teez
December 04 2016, 02:30PM
Trash it!
6
trashes
Props
47
props

Love shattenkirk and would love to see him running our 1st unit PP. he understands the concept of moving to a shooting lane instead of blindly slapping the puck at the general vicinity of the net, and hitting the first shot blocker



Aside- I feel like now that 97 is established, people are throwing the term 'generational talent' around way too frequently. Burns is an elite, superstar offensive defensive. Generational talent? Dunno about that

Avatar
#3 Mitch92
December 04 2016, 03:01PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
32
props

Great. Now Shattenkirk is going to resign with the Blue's before noon Monday.

Avatar
#4 Gadgets
December 04 2016, 03:20PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
15
props

That's a lot of words for someone who doesn't want to come here and would cost too much

Avatar
#5 I am Batman
December 04 2016, 03:37PM
Trash it!
18
trashes
Props
5
props

This has Toronto written all over....

Avatar
#6 Glass
December 04 2016, 03:44PM
Trash it!
2
trashes
Props
3
props

Thoughts on Michael Stone as a free agent?

Avatar
#7 fisherprice
December 04 2016, 03:45PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
15
props
the dope $teez wrote:

Love shattenkirk and would love to see him running our 1st unit PP. he understands the concept of moving to a shooting lane instead of blindly slapping the puck at the general vicinity of the net, and hitting the first shot blocker



Aside- I feel like now that 97 is established, people are throwing the term 'generational talent' around way too frequently. Burns is an elite, superstar offensive defensive. Generational talent? Dunno about that

Agree about the 'generational' thing. You can't really be a 'generational' player if there are several of them in a generation. As far as I'm concerned, Connor is the first generational player to come along since Crosby/Ovechkin.

Avatar
#8 PepsiForTheWin
December 04 2016, 04:21PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
21
props

@the dope $teez

Generational talents don't have 4 players better than them currently playing in the same role

Avatar
#9 Spydyr
December 04 2016, 04:45PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
14
props

In the last Elliotte Friedman's 30 thoughts he mentioned that the Oilers had permission to talk to Shattenkirk last spring and got no where.

Friedman when on to state he does not feel Shattenkirk has any interest in coming to Edmonton.

I agree with that assessment.So no Shattenkirk here.

Avatar
#10 Oiler Al
December 04 2016, 05:17PM
Trash it!
3
trashes
Props
15
props

Matt Henderson probably would not like Shattenkirk either. Still whining about Russell on Hockey Buzz again today.

Avatar
#11 Marty
December 04 2016, 05:32PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
2
props

the Rangers won't have the space in the end. unless Staal plays well enough to be traded, no one is taking on Girardi for more than half his salary. could see him end up in new jersey if shero is willing to spend but he's stated he's weary of spending near the cap.

Avatar
#12 L
December 04 2016, 05:34PM
Trash it!
4
trashes
Props
14
props
Oiler Al wrote:

Matt Henderson probably would not like Shattenkirk either. Still whining about Russell on Hockey Buzz again today.

Henderson just is a loser.

Avatar
#13 IRONman
December 04 2016, 06:42PM
Trash it!
10
trashes
Props
0
props

Sounds like 2005 all over again, when we got Pronger.

Anything is possible

He might want to play with McDavid.

Lucic said yes to 6 mill

Pay him $8 million per season might change his mind

Avatar
#14 Spydyr
December 04 2016, 06:49PM
Trash it!
1
trashes
Props
17
props
IRONman wrote:

Sounds like 2005 all over again, when we got Pronger.

Anything is possible

He might want to play with McDavid.

Lucic said yes to 6 mill

Pay him $8 million per season might change his mind

So.....you think Shattenkirk is worth eight million a season?

Drinking a little before the game are we?

Avatar
#15 Oilerchild77
December 04 2016, 10:47PM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
5
props

Shattenkirk would definitely check off a big need for the Oilers. Problem is, he checks off a lot of teams' needs and I don't think the Oilers should be getting into a bidding war because they have their own cap situation to consider. Unless of course they manage to dump a bunch of salary before July 1st.

But even then, I don't think Shattenkirk wants to play in Edmonton. He wants a nice, cushy eastern conference travelling schedule and play in the flashing lights of the Big Apple. From the pieces of info (rumors) we've heard, it sounds like Chiarelli has already gotten a firm no from Shattenkirk's camp regarding a possible extension with the Oilers, which is probably why a trade didn't happen this past summer. So I guess that's why we're hearing about a Kris Russell extension, because when the dust settles, he might actually be the best option in free agency.

Avatar
#16 CornDogsBruh
December 05 2016, 11:22AM
Trash it!
0
trashes
Props
4
props

Whomever wrote this article uses the term "Generational Talent" way too loosely. I love Burn's game too but come on...

Comments are closed for this article.