May 31 2012 07:28PM
As Eric noted yesterday, Martin Brodeur's true talent may not be captured by his save percentage, since the home scorer in New Jersey probably did not count shots as effectively. Brodeur faced much fewer shots against in Jersey and had a lower save percentage. But his goals against was also much lower as well, leading me to believe that the Devils ought to have played better at home, but on the surface, Brodeur didn't.
May 25 2012 01:51PM
This new, regular feature on NHLNumbers will share interesting stats-related posts from around the web every week.
Headed towards the offseason, we don't have too much to pore over this week, but there are a few concepts of note...
May 22 2012 05:05PM
(--NOTE-- This piece was written by Rob Pettapiece of The CIS Blog , known also for his work on players who claim to be in the the best shape of their lives and he is also the man behind the significant discovery that Canadian teenagers age . Visit his more general sports blog here . Primarily a baseball guy, I often joke with Rob that he knew about Corsi and advanced hockey stats before he knew anything about hockey.)
We know that players with more offensive zone starts tend to have better offensive numbers. But are those players given these OZone starts because they are better offensively, or do they merely appear better offensively because they are given these zone starts? In other words, we know there's a correlation, but where is the causation, if any?
The Canucks' justification for trading Cody Hodgson suggests that you can inflate a player's statistics if you give him more offensive zone time, so at least one team (and many of its fans) believe that it's the zone starts that make the player, to some extent. But how can we figure out just how much a zone start is worth to a player's offensive numbers?